For example, the Transportation Department has to get into forestry because highways might need to-as cars disappear-become forests. We have to make everything in the city that relates to landscape do two or three things. This speaks to your point, “We have been separating humans from nature.” Well, the city has also, through zonification, had very clear divisions between recreation, commerce, housing, production, and infrastructure. For instance, we cannot continue to have mono-functional infrastructures. Landscape architecture, which started very much as a discipline to improve living conditions in cities, is now expanding to address a greater set of challenges because although cities cover a very small percentage of the earth’s surface, they cause the most damage. It has always had this double-gaze: one that wants to support urban processes which are fundamentally instrumental and productive, and another gaze which tells us, “Let’s give shape and direction to those forces of capitalism so that they don’t get out of hand, so that it’s not just about maximization of efficiencies and profit, but also about sustaining culture, quality of human life, and now, of course, the climate and the health of the ecosystem.” Landscape is both generative of and supportive of urbanization and of capitalism, but it’s like Janus. Landscape architecture comes in to give organization and to mediate between existing natural processes (hydrological structures, environmental structures, ecology), the economic operations that define the city, and of course, the needs of the society that lives and works there. In fact, we could say the intellectual project of landscape architecture is to understand this dynamic between nature, the economy, and society. Landscape architecture is the kind of mediating framework between what we know as “nature” (in the sense of natural processes), and society. Landscaping appears to be another very interesting point of investigation, because you are working with living natural elements. We have for example spoken with philosophers Graham Harman and Timothy Morton about object-oriented ontology (OOO) theory. In the context of the Anthropocene, we are exploring new kinds of interactions between humanity, technology, and nature. Stream 04 is investigating the theme of the living. Share this article Facebook twitter mail.It must shape spaces of production but also symbolic tools in order to develop our relationship with the environment through an increased awareness of where food comes from.

Urban agriculture must also acquire a social and popular dimension so as not to remain anecdotic. Resolving complex environmental issues requires an interdisciplinary approach, the establishment of international coalitions and regulations, but also the multiplication of citizens’ initiatives. From simple adjunct to the improvement of the conditions of urban living, the landscape extends its role to the redefinition of a city that goes further than multifunctional infrastructures to create complex spaces that contain multiple interactions and possess many uses. Landscaper Anita Berrizbeitia explains the way in which her activity explores the dynamics between nature, the economy, and society. With the return of the living to the urban space, the landscape-as a discipline-has become a fertile conceptual framework for architecture.

City landscape supplies eagle farm